# The Moneyist: My husband and I are divorcing. I brought \$35K into the marriage. He wants me to subtract that money from our home’s equity. I say split the equity first

Dear Quentin,

My husband and I are divorcing, and we live in Minnesota.

I came into the marriage with \$ 35,000 from the sale of my home, and he came into the marriage with debt. Our current home is valued at \$ 320,000 with a \$ 225,000 mortgage. He has agreed to return my \$ 35,000 to me.

However, he wants to subtract the \$ 35,000 from the current value of the house and then split the equity in half.

I think it’s more fair to split the \$ 95,000 equity first and then pull the \$ 35,000 out of his half of the equity.

I honestly don’t know what the fairest way is as each one has very different outcomes. We’re trying to be civil and do this without attorneys. Thank you for looking at this for me.

What do you think would be a fair way of splitting our assets?

Soon-to-be Single

You can email The Moneyist with any financial and ethical questions related to coronavirus at qfottrell@marketwatch.com, and follow Quentin Fottrell on Twitter.

Dear Soon,

Divorce is a time to be practical — rather than polite.

It’s great that you want to split your assets without an attorney. It can be done if your assets are very simple, but hire a lawyer if you can afford one to make sure you don’t leave any loose ends that could cause problems later.

Incomplete or incorrect forms can lead to the rejection of your divorce application. That can cost you time, hassle and money. The downside to hiring a lawyer: It can cost up to \$ 15,000, or more.

That said, I’m on your side. Your suggestion leaves you with \$ 82,500 from the sale of your home and gives him \$ 12,500. (\$ 320,000 minus \$ 225,000 = \$ 95,000 divided by two = \$ 47,500 (\$ 12,500 for him and \$ 82,500 for you).

His way: By subtracting the \$ 35,000 you invested in the property from its current value, he receives \$ 30,000 and you receive \$ 65,000 (\$ 320,000 minus \$ 35,000 = \$ 285,000 minus \$ 225,000 = \$ 60,000 (\$ 30,000 for him and \$ 65,000 for you).

Your husband’s offer is a generous one. You technically commingled your assets, so he could — if he were operating strictly by the letter of the law — insist that the equity in your home be split 50/50.

He wants to make sure that you leave the marriage with what you had when you came into it. Perhaps it’s his way of making amends for words and actions that cannot be undone.

Treat that \$ 35,000 as a lien on your home — you invested in the marital home when you purchased it, after all. And he arrived with debt. That \$ 65,000 could come in very useful in your new life.

You may end up needing that lawyer.

By emailing your questions, you agree to having them published anonymously on MarketWatch. By submitting your story to Dow Jones & Company, the publisher of MarketWatch, you understand and agree that we may use your story, or versions of it, in all media and platforms, including via third parties.

Check out the Moneyist private Facebook group, where we look for answers to life’s thorniest money issues. Readers write in to me with all sorts of dilemmas. Post your questions, tell me what you want to know more about, or weigh in on the latest Moneyist columns.

The Moneyist regrets he cannot reply to questions individually.

More from Quentin Fottrell: