Indian Stock/Share Market | Commodities | Sensex | Nifty | MCX | NCDEX | Nse | Bse | Live Rates
Posted on Tuesday, February 19, 2013 - 01:21 amShort URL:
Short URL:
Could not get element asset data.
Request to the NewsHub service was:
http://api.nhub.media.yahoo.com:4080/search/1.0/-/items/categoryset=has=%2FAA%2FDLS%2FI1I%2FI1N%2FI1P%2F*&cat_taxoLocale==en-US&httph_accept-language==en-US&chs_market==us&tagset=has=YFIN_PRESS_RELEASE,YFIN_NOT_PRESS_RELEASE,YFIN_REGULATORY/offset=0&count=26&result-metadata=custommetas
Error message from the element web service was:
ERROR from Cronkite: connect() timed out!
Short URL:
KOLKATA: Global commodities prices fell further on Wednesday, weighed down by the fall of the euro following political uncertainty in Greece and France. Traders and analysts said the Indian consumer’s gains would be capped by the weakness of the rupee.
Crude oil slumped for the sixth consecutive day, falling to $ 112 a barrel from $ 126 last month, while gold prices declined for the third day in a row. The weak sentiment also hit silver, palm oil, sugar and base metals. The Australian dollar, which is linked to commodities, also fell to a four-month low.
Gold fell to a level below $ 1,600 an ounce, an important resistance level in technical analysis, for the first time since January.
The last time it went below this level was on January 5, this year, when it closed at $ 1,597.70 an ounce.
COMEX benchmark gold contract was trading at $ 1,587.40 an ounce, affected by a sell off across markets pressured by the looming Eurozone debt crisis.
Global investors fretted about the political upheaval in Greece that threatens to sink the nation into chaos and endanger the euro zone’s efforts to handle the debt crisis.
Analysts said the slide in base metal prices may affect the Indian equity market, which is going through choppy sessions, as the global trend can hurt shares of steel and mining companies. Funds and institutional investors led the sell-off in metals markets, cutting exposure to assets considered risky and seeking to raise cash, traders said.
“The recent France and Greece elections shook the markets and triggered a selloff across markets,” said Mr C P Krishnan, director of Geojit Comtrade. In the domestic markets, gold prices declined, mirroring international markets, but the upside was capped by the weakness in the rupee. MCX gold was trading at $ 28,524, down 0.44% or 127 from previous close. Prithviraj Kothari, president, Bombay Bullion Association, said that the gold demand in India still looks too bearish and may not gain up from here until rupee appreciates against dollar.
Commodities-Markets-The Economic Times
Short URL:
Between March 2001 and April 2012, the price of gold never fell for 3 months in succession. “Two months max”made for a great slogan and signal to buy on pullbacks, most recently in January 2010, your last chance to do so below $1,100, and April 2009, which was your last chance to buy below $900. Divide by ten and we’re talking about the price of the GLD.
Until April 2012 that third down month just never came.
Three consecutive months of falling gold prices are so rare that you can count the occurrences. Since 1957 in fact, they’ve struck only 65 times in a total of 661 three-month periods.
These three-month drops – let’s call them recessions to save me having to re-title these charts again – are rarer still in the U.S. stock market.
The S&P 500 index has delivered only 55 runs of 3-month drops over the same 55-year period.
As both charts show, three-month recessions are rarest of all in a runaway bull market. The S&P 500 put in none between 1991 and 1999, just as prices to buy gold put in none between 2001 and spring 2012. 
So, is this three-month tumble the last straw for gold, finally snapping the camel’s back after the big hump of $1920 per ounce last summer? After all, the big top of January 1980, after which gold prices spent two decades in decline, took almost a year to deliver a three-month run of falling prices. Three losing months came thick and fast after that.
Three-month declines don’t necessarily signal a bear trend. The S&P 500 suffered such falls in each of July, August and September last year – making for five monthly falls on the trot, in fact, over spring/summer 2011.
The U.S. stock index still went on to recover and top that starting level, however, just as it went on to recover and blast through its previous highs after hitting a run of three-month recessions in 1990, not even midway through its long 18-year bull run.
Check also the sharp pullback in dollar gold-prices during 1975-76 on our chart above. Gold fell in seventeen of those 24 months, halving from top to bottom and recording 10 three-month recessions, more than during any other two-year period, including the early 1980s or the big brown bottom of the late 1990s.
Who was to know, amid that mid-1970s bloodbath that gold was on its way to rising sixfold again?
Short URL:
In trading on Tuesday, shares of Occidental Petroleum Corp (NYSE: OXY) crossed above their 200 day moving average of $92.85, changing hands as high as $93.09 per share. Occidental Petroleum Corp shares are currently trading up about 1.9% on the day. The chart below shows the one year performance of OXY shares, versus its 200 day moving average:
Click here to find out which 9 other stocks recently crossed above their 200 day moving average »

Looking at the chart above, OXY’s low point in its 52 week range is $66.36 per share, with $117.89 as the 52 week high point — that compares with a last trade of $92.95.
According to the ETF Finder at ETF Channel, OXY makes up 15.91% of the iShares Dow Jones U.S. Oil & Gas Exploration & Production Index Fund ETF (AMEX: IEO) which is trading higher by about 1.6% on the day Tuesday.
See what other ETFs contain OXY »
See what other stocks are held by IEO »
Short URL:
FINDLAY, Ohio, May 1, 2012 – Marathon Petroleum Corporation (MPC) announced today that while it continues to evaluate strategic alternatives to enhance shareholder value with respect to certain midstream assets, MPC`s board of directors has authorized and directed its evaluation team to further explore the formation and initial public offering of a master limited partnership (MLP) and to prepare a registration statement.
If MPC determines to further pursue an initial public offering of an MLP, the issuer would be a wholly-owned subsidiary, MPLX LP. MPC would contribute a portion of its midstream assets to the MLP and sell a minority interest in the MLP in an initial public offering. The potential MLP would support MPC`s strategy to grow its midstream business, initially through a contribution of an interest in certain onshore common carrier pipeline assets located in the Midwest and Gulf Coast regions of the U.S.
If pursued, MPC would expect to file a registration statement relating to the common units to be sold in a potential initial public offering with the Securities and Exchange Commission during the third quarter, subject to final MPC board approval and prevailing market conditions.
There can be no assurance that the evaluation process will lead to an initial public offering of an MLP or any other transaction, or that if any transaction is further pursued, that it will be consummated. This announcement does not constitute an offer to sell, or the solicitation of an offer to buy, any securities. This announcement is being issued pursuant to, and in accordance with, Rule 135 under the Securities Act of 1933.
This announcement contains certain statements that are “forward-looking” statements within the meaning of Section 27A of the Securities Act of 1933 and Section 21E of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 concerning MPC`s possible initial public offering of interests in an MLP. These statements contain words such as “possible,” “intend,” “will”, “if” and “expect” and can be impacted by numerous factors including the risk that an initial public offering may not occur, risks relating to the securities markets generally, the impact of adverse market conditions affecting MPC`s midstream business, adverse changes in laws including with respect to tax and regulatory matters and other risks. There can be no assurance that actual results will not differ from MPC`s expectations. For more information concerning factors that could affect these statements see MPC`s most recent annual report on Form 10-K, filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission. MPC undertakes no obligation to update or revise such forward-looking statements to reflect events or circumstances that occur, or which MPC becomes aware of, after the date hereof.
# # #
MPC Update on Strategic Alternatives
The owner of this announcement warrants that:
(i) the releases contained herein are protected by copyright and other applicable laws; and
(ii) they are solely responsible for the content, accuracy and originality of the
information contained therein.
Source: Marathon Petroleum Corporation via Thomson Reuters ONE
HUG#1607605
Short URL:
British oil major BP will come out with its Q1 earnings on Tuesday. We expect the company to post a year-on-year increase in earnings backed by high oil prices; however, lower output could impact its results.
Rival Exxon Mobil saw its quarterly earnings drop in Q1 because of its exposure to low gas prices in North America. BP, which has focused on high-returns, liquids and international natural gas opportunities, should see a limited impact on its overall earnings. The company officials had earlier said that BP would look to increase volumes after they bottomed out in the last quarter of 2011.
We have a $57.72 price estimate for BP, which is at a 35% premium to its current price estimate.
Click here for our full analysis of BP.
Production volumes key
Oil prices remained high in the first quarter of 2012, held up by rising tensions with Iran and a revival in the U.S. economy. Upstream earnings should also hold up with the high oil prices overriding low natural gas prices in North America.
In addition, we will closely watch BP’s production volumes to judge whether the company’s plan to revive operations are beginning to show results. The company’s output has seen consecutive declines since the Gulf of Mexico disaster in 2010. The drilling moratorium in the Gulf has had a huge impact on BP’s exploration and production plans overall. Although the moratorium has been lifted, the company’s production volumes in the region have still not recovered.
BP has said that its upcoming projects in Angola, the North Sea and new drilling in the Gulf should help the company boost volumes. Volumes from its Russian subsidiary TNK-BP have also been strong over the past few quarters.
Downstream
Downstream earnings should show an improvement in Q1 because of higher volumes as well as better refining margins in the last quarter. BP has been going ahead with a program to sell its low margin refining assets. Profits from asset sales could also boost the company’s downstream earnings in the period.
Understand how a company’s products impacts its stock price on Trefis.
Short URL:
As the center of gravity in the global refining industry shifts away from American consumers to rapidly growing emerging markets, oil and gas companies face major implications. Sales in the US, once a key driver for global crude oil prices, have weakened in the sluggish economy and may not recover to previous levels, given the rising number of hybrids and electric vehicles. In developing markets, unpredictable demand has resulted in price volatility. Meanwhile, high oil prices and environmental costs put pressure on margins, sometimes leading to asset restructurings, sales or even bankruptcies. And despite excess supply and low margins, national oil companies (NOCs) continue to build out their refining capacity. In this turbulent environment, companies will survive only if they take matters into their own hands, rethinking their strategy in response to the industry’s new dynamics.
The key to staying ahead rests on answering three critical questions.
How to benefit from the growing activity in emerging economies? The developing world—Asia in particular—will increasingly determine global fuels demand. OPEC estimates that between 2015 and 2020, demand for liquid fuels in the Asia-Pacific region will grow at 2% annually, while in North America and Europe, demand may decline slightly.
Supply is shifting, too. NOCs continue to add refining capacity because it raises their margins over exporting crude. Many have formed partnerships with international oil companies (IOCs) to benefit from their operational expertise, and their access to global markets. For IOCs, these joint ventures give them access to the NOCs’ domestic markets, with favorable tax terms and beneficial financing. NOCs also have advantages in building storage and pipeline infrastructure, especially in their own countries.
But three key principles help these alliances succeed. First, there needs to be clear agreement on strategy. Partners may have different goals. For example, NOCs may want to protect national markets while IOCs aim to create shareholder value. Second, success will require effective decision-making. Management of the new entity must agree on critical decisions up front and clearly define roles and decision rights. If there’s ambiguity, the success of the partnership may be threatened. Finally, joint ventures work best when they are supported by well-defined processes and metrics. The best joint ventures embed these in the organization’s design to enable efficient operations.
What is the right asset portfolio? Given the slowing growth in demand, we expect many refineries to cut back on the production of traditional liquid fuels, even while they may be ramping up production of alternative products and trimming their portfolios. Winning companies will consider a host of options.
For example, cleaner diesel has long been popular in Europe. It’s now becoming the preferred fuel in China and the rest of Asia. To meet the demand, IOCs around the world are upgrading refineries to produce low-sulfur diesel. Lubricants and petrochemicals also are becoming more attractive. That’s why Total started building a lubricant-blending plant in Tianjin, China, last November, and ExxonMobil will expand a petrochemical plant in Singapore this year. And biofuels aren’t going away, so smart IOCs are making strategic investments. Compared with alternative technologies, biofuels are an attractive investment, since they perpetuate the internal-combustion engine and in several cases share the same logistics and distribution infrastructure as gasoline and diesel.
Industry leaders also are pruning their portfolios. Shell is selling assets in the UK, Africa, Scandinavia, Greece and New Zealand, and ConocoPhillips said it would sell about $10 billion of downstream assets over two years. The sales have generated a wave of consolidation across the refining industry as incumbents and newcomers try to gain an edge through more efficient operations.
How to achieve world-class operational excellence? Margins are critical in a commodities business like refining. Companies that lower costs can benefit with significantly higher returns on capital employed—sometimes by as much as three times.
Even companies with better-than-average cost positions have opportunities to improve. In our experience, they boost the output of finished products, usually through higher utilization and throughput. They increase yield, which reduces crude and overall feedstock costs. And they lower fixed costs by improving labor productivity and reducing maintenance costs.
The shifting of demand growth to emerging economies and the rise of the NOCs pose challenges for refiners—but also new opportunities. By forming partnerships with well-positioned NOCs, by deciding how to benefit from emerging markets, by rebalancing their asset portfolio to address changing dynamics, and by raising their game in operational efficiency, companies can find new life—ahead of the competition—in a rapidly evolving industry.
Andy Steinhubl is a Bain & Company partner in Houston and a member of the North American Oil and Gas practice. José de Sá is a partner in the firm’s Rio de Janeiro office and a member of the Oil and Gas practice.
Short URL:
As the center of gravity in the global refining industry shifts away from American consumers to rapidly growing emerging markets, oil and gas companies face major implications. Sales in the US, once a key driver for global crude oil prices, have weakened in the sluggish economy and may not recover to previous levels, given the rising number of hybrids and electric vehicles. In developing markets, unpredictable demand has resulted in price volatility. Meanwhile, high oil prices and environmental costs put pressure on margins, sometimes leading to asset restructurings, sales or even bankruptcies. And despite excess supply and low margins, national oil companies (NOCs) continue to build out their refining capacity. In this turbulent environment, companies will survive only if they take matters into their own hands, rethinking their strategy in response to the industry’s new dynamics.
The key to staying ahead rests on answering three critical questions.
How to benefit from the growing activity in emerging economies? The developing world—Asia in particular—will increasingly determine global fuels demand. OPEC estimates that between 2015 and 2020, demand for liquid fuels in the Asia-Pacific region will grow at 2% annually, while in North America and Europe, demand may decline slightly.
Supply is shifting, too. NOCs continue to add refining capacity because it raises their margins over exporting crude. Many have formed partnerships with international oil companies (IOCs) to benefit from their operational expertise, and their access to global markets. For IOCs, these joint ventures give them access to the NOCs’ domestic markets, with favorable tax terms and beneficial financing. NOCs also have advantages in building storage and pipeline infrastructure, especially in their own countries.
But three key principles help these alliances succeed. First, there needs to be clear agreement on strategy. Partners may have different goals. For example, NOCs may want to protect national markets while IOCs aim to create shareholder value. Second, success will require effective decision-making. Management of the new entity must agree on critical decisions up front and clearly define roles and decision rights. If there’s ambiguity, the success of the partnership may be threatened. Finally, joint ventures work best when they are supported by well-defined processes and metrics. The best joint ventures embed these in the organization’s design to enable efficient operations.
What is the right asset portfolio? Given the slowing growth in demand, we expect many refineries to cut back on the production of traditional liquid fuels, even while they may be ramping up production of alternative products and trimming their portfolios. Winning companies will consider a host of options.
For example, cleaner diesel has long been popular in Europe. It’s now becoming the preferred fuel in China and the rest of Asia. To meet the demand, IOCs around the world are upgrading refineries to produce low-sulfur diesel. Lubricants and petrochemicals also are becoming more attractive. That’s why Total started building a lubricant-blending plant in Tianjin, China, last November, and ExxonMobil will expand a petrochemical plant in Singapore this year. And biofuels aren’t going away, so smart IOCs are making strategic investments. Compared with alternative technologies, biofuels are an attractive investment, since they perpetuate the internal-combustion engine and in several cases share the same logistics and distribution infrastructure as gasoline and diesel.
Industry leaders also are pruning their portfolios. Shell is selling assets in the UK, Africa, Scandinavia, Greece and New Zealand, and ConocoPhillips said it would sell about $10 billion of downstream assets over two years. The sales have generated a wave of consolidation across the refining industry as incumbents and newcomers try to gain an edge through more efficient operations.
How to achieve world-class operational excellence? Margins are critical in a commodities business like refining. Companies that lower costs can benefit with significantly higher returns on capital employed—sometimes by as much as three times.
Even companies with better-than-average cost positions have opportunities to improve. In our experience, they boost the output of finished products, usually through higher utilization and throughput. They increase yield, which reduces crude and overall feedstock costs. And they lower fixed costs by improving labor productivity and reducing maintenance costs.
The shifting of demand growth to emerging economies and the rise of the NOCs pose challenges for refiners—but also new opportunities. By forming partnerships with well-positioned NOCs, by deciding how to benefit from emerging markets, by rebalancing their asset portfolio to address changing dynamics, and by raising their game in operational efficiency, companies can find new life—ahead of the competition—in a rapidly evolving industry.
Andy Steinhubl is a Bain & Company partner in Houston and a member of the North American Oil and Gas practice. José de Sá is a partner in the firm’s Rio de Janeiro office and a member of the Oil and Gas practice.
Short URL:
In trading on Monday, shares of Stillwater Mining Co. (NYSE: SWC) entered into oversold territory, changing hands as low as $10.42 per share. We define oversold territory using the Relative Strength Index, or RSI, which is a technical analysis indicator used to measure momentum on a scale of zero to 100. A stock is considered to be oversold if the RSI reading falls below 30.
In the case of Stillwater Mining Co., the RSI reading has hit 29.3 — by comparison, the universe of metals and mining stocks covered by Metals Channel currently has an average RSI of 46.3, the RSI of Spot Gold is at 55.6, and the RSI of Spot Silver is presently 44.8.
A bullish investor could look at SWC’s 29.3 reading as a sign that the recent heavy selling is in the process of exhausting itself, and begin to look for entry point opportunities on the buy side.
Looking at a chart of one year performance (below), SWC’s low point in its 52 week range is $7.31 per share, with $24.04 as the 52 week high point — that compares with a last trade of $10.50. Stillwater Mining Co. shares are currently trading down about 1.1% on the day.

According to the ETF Finder at ETF Channel, SWC makes up 3.87% of the First Trust ISE Global Platinum Index Fund ETF (NASD: PLTM) which is trading lower by about 0.7% on the day Monday.
See what other ETFs contain SWC »
See what other stocks are held by PLTM »
Short URL: